Planned vs. reactive maintenance: what’s the difference?

Maintenance is crucial for ensuring that any facility, premises, or equipment remains in good working order. It ensures safety, security, and operational efficiency.

Businesses typically approach maintenance in two ways: planned maintenance and reactive maintenance. Each has its place, and organisations often combine both. But what are they, and how do you choose what’s right for your business?

Planned maintenance: Planned maintenance involves bespoke, building-specific programs designed to maintain asset and premises compliance while minimising disruption. It includes regular and routine maintenance of assets and equipment to prevent unexpected failures and reduce downtime. Organisations agree on a specific program of works to ensure that buildings and assets function correctly. This program covers types of checks, works, and frequency, often tied to specific KPIs.

Reactive maintenance: Reactive maintenance involves repairing assets to standard operating conditions after unsatisfactory performance or faults occur. This approach usually incurs lower expenditure and staffing costs compared to planned maintenance, as tasks are limited to fixing pre-determined issues or faults. Reactive maintenance tasks arise from unexpected events, requiring urgent repairs to restore the functionality of a building or asset.

The benefits of planned vs. reactive maintenance

  • Reduced costs: A proactive approach with a well-designed planned maintenance program can significantly reduce ongoing maintenance costs. Addressing issues before failure avoids repeated repair costs.
  • Safe working environment: Proactively maintaining assets protects the safety of building users and the general public.
  • Increased asset life: A bespoke planned maintenance program can extend the lifecycle of assets, providing commercial and operational benefits.
  • Minimised disruption: Planned maintenance programs ensure that required downtime is scheduled during low-use periods, minimising disruption to business operations.

Choosing the right strategy for your organisation

Selecting the right maintenance strategy is a key decision. As shown, there are significant differences and specific advantages to a planned maintenance approach. The right facilities management partner can help define your strategy, considering factors such as equipment types, facility or property type, available budget, and operational goals and KPIs.

Aegis Support Services secures three-year security services contract with Luton Sixth Form College

Aegis Support Services has announced it has secured a new five-year contract with Luton Sixth...

The role of a 24/7 control room in protecting businesses

A 24/7 control room does far more than monitor CCTV. Find out how continuous security...

Getting your school ready for the new academic year

The weeks before a new school year offer the perfect opportunity to prepare your site...

Aegis Support Services Achieves ACS Pacesetter Accreditation

Aegis Support Services is proud to have achieved ACS Pacesetter status.

Why vacant properties need more than locked doors

Empty properties face unique security risks. Find out how to protect your investment with vacant...

10 common security vulnerabilities businesses overlook

From access control to perimeter security, discover the most common business security vulnerabilities and practical...

Why summer creates new site security risks

From vacant premises to increased footfall, discover how seasonal changes can influence security risks across...

Keeping businesses safe during the summer surge

Hospitality security, event security, seasonal staffing and cleaning services are key to managing summer demand...

Back to Case studies Back to Insights and news

Sign up to receive our latest tips, hints, and updates on improving your approach to security and facilities management.